‘Hidden’ report reveals air pollution at 27 Hackney schools over EU limits
Exposed: report uncovered links between levels of air pollution and deprivation. Photograph: David Holt via Flickr
Air pollution levels at 27 Hackney primary schools are breached EU limits for nitrogen dioxide (NO2), a newly emerged report has revealed.
An air quality report said that in 2010 a total of 433 of London’s 1,777 primary schools were located in areas where NO2 pollution exceeded EU limits.
Of those 433 schools, 27 were in Hackney.
De Beauvoir Primary, St John the Baptist Church of England Primary and St Monica’s Roman Catholic were in the top 100 worst hit schools for nitrogen dioxide levels in the capital.
The figures appeared in Analysing Air Pollution Exposure in London, an air quality report by independent consultancy Aether. It was commissioned in early 2013 by the Greater London Authority (GLA) whilst Boris Johnson was London Mayor.
The researchers found that in 2010, residents in the city’s most deprived boroughs, including Hackney, Tower Hamlets and Newham, tended on average to be more exposed to poor air quality than those in wealthier areas.
The report was commissioned in early 2013 by the Greater London Authority (GLA) whilst Boris Johnson was London Mayor. It was completed in September that year but never published.
The former Conservative mayor has been criticised by Councillor Feryal Demirci, Cabinet Member for Neighbourhoods and Sustainability at Hackney Council, for not publishing the report during his mayoralty.
She said: “I am extremely disappointed that this report was hidden back in 2013. Air pollution is one of the biggest threats to public health in London – no child should have to put up with it.
“Last year Hackney Council published its air quality action plan, which sets out how we will work towards meeting national air quality objectives for nitrogen dioxide. But we can’t achieve this alone – that is why since 2014 we have been calling on the mayor of London to extend the ultra low emission zone.
“We will also look at ways to reduce traffic outside schools during the morning and evening rush-hours.”
In 2015 Hackney Council published a 10-year transport strategy with actions to improve air quality.
They included creating ‘low emission neighbourhoods’, slashing the numbers of heavy and light goods vehicles on the roads, charging lower-emission vehicles less to park in the borough, more electric vehicle charging points and neighbourhood traffic reviews to cut rat-running.
A spokesperson for newly-elected London Mayor Sadiq Khan said: “This shocking report reveals a snapshot of the true impact that our polluted air has on some of London’s most vulnerable communities.
“It is difficult to understand why the last mayoralty decided to cover it up and not fully release it in 2013 – they clearly didn’t want Londoners to know the dire state of pollution in the capital.”
Of the 1,344 schools located in areas below the pollution limit, less than a fifth were in deprived areas.
Although the number of affected schools is expected to reduce significantly by 2020, there is still a “clear disparity” between deprived and non-deprived schools, the report said.
Caroline Russell, a Green party London assembly member, said: “Children are at risk of reduced lung capacity and are particularly vulnerable to developing asthma from excessive vehicular pollution. It is staggering that Boris Johnson sat on this report for two and a half years.”
Nitrogen dioxide is linked to respiratory problems and is produced by diesel vehicles.
The 27 Hackney primary schools and average NO2 concentration in 2010 (measured in milligrams per cubic metre) were:
De Beauvoir Primary School 49.37
St John the Baptist Voluntary Aided Church of England Primary School 49.23
St Monica’s Roman Catholic Primary School 48.71
St John and St James CofE Primary School 47.44
Brook Community Primary School 45.35
Colvestone Primary School 45.27
Burbage School 44.95
Morningside Primary School 44.71
St. Dominic’s Catholic Primary School 44.24
Orchard Primary School 43.86
Randal Cremer Primary School 43.8
Holy Trinity Church of England Primary School 43.69
William Patten Primary School 43.25
London Fields Primary School 42.99
Berger Primary School 42.81
Lubavitch Ruth Lunzer Girls Primary School 42.75
Whitmore Primary School 42.72
Thomas Fairchild Community School 42.72
Queensbridge Primary School 42.3
Sebright School 41.63
Our Lady and St Joseph Roman Catholic Primary School 41.55
St John of Jerusalem Church of England Primary School 41.27
Lauriston School 41.16
Baden-Powell School 41
Gainsborough Primary School 40.91
Gayhurst Community School 40.63
St Mary’s Church of England Primary School, Stoke Newington 40.31
It is significant that so far that no comment has been seen from any of the London Assembly Members – on the records enlisted and “representing” Hackney, Tower Hamlets, Newham (and surrounding areas affected by the pollutions) who were on paid attendance as Assembly members during the calendar years 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 (unto April 2016).
I blame Boris Johnson, for sure.
I blame those Assembly members were allowed Boris Johnson to SUPPRESS the particular pollution report.
I also blame the Party managers who have been as unaccountable about what the various Assembly members have been allowed to do: fail the parts of London that their careers are
built on.
It is easy to say Boris hid the Truth, because he has left office.
Also the successor Sadiq Khan has chosen to make pollution one of his early concerns.
expense of the health and well being
But that cannot be the solution.
The Assembly must be asking questions daily or they membership of the Assembly is
an unhealthy Absurdity and Waste at the expense of the health and wellbeing millions of London people…CHILDREN, adolescents, adults and old, of all backgrounds, outlooks and grouping.
Sadiq Khan should now publish all the hidden evidence that affected the lives and
needs of the people of London over the past 15 years.
It is not a Big Ask at all.
It is by every criteria far more economical and sustainable than any m month of the
output of PR fabrications from the Government of the day.
A healthy London population can save £Billions every year.
A healthy London population can only be possible with a healthy, transparent, truthfully
Democratic and accountable London Assembly, “London Mayor” and all the other
publicly paid post holders across the Boroughs and in the Boroughs’ Councils.
Be they “executive/elected” mayors, “ruling Group” “leader/s” or elected councillors.
1058 Hrs GMT London Weds 18 May 2016
It is significant that so far that no comment has been seen from any of the London Assembly Members – on the records enlisted and “representing” Hackney, Tower Hamlets, Newham (and surrounding areas affected by the pollutions) who were on paid attendance as Assembly members during the calendar years 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 (unto April 2016).
I blame Boris Johnson, for sure.
I blame those Assembly members who allowed Boris Johnson to SUPPRESS the particular pollution report.
I also blame the Party managers who have been as unaccountable about what the various Assembly members have been allowed to do: fail the parts of London that their careers are built on.
It is easy to say Boris hid the Truth, because he has left office.
Also the successor Sadiq Khan has chosen to make pollution one of his early concerns.
But that cannot be the solution.
The London Assembly must be asking questions daily or the membership of the Assembly is BOUND TO BE EXPOSED as
an unhealthy Absurdity and Waste at the expense of the health and wellbeing millions of London people…CHILDREN, adolescents, adults and old, of all backgrounds, outlooks and grouping.
Sadiq Khan should now publish all the hidden evidence that affected the lives and
needs of the people of London during the past 15 years.
It is not a Big Ask at all.
It is by every criteria far more economical and sustainable than any m month of the
output of PR fabrications from the Government of the day.
A healthy London population can save £Billions every year.
A healthy London population can only be possible with a healthy, transparent, truthfully Democratic and accountable London Assembly, “London Mayor” and all the other publicly paid post-holders across the Boroughs and in the Boroughs’ Councils.
Be they “executive/elected” mayors, “ruling Group” “leader/s” or elected councillors.
1104 Hrs GMT London Weds 18 May 2016
Of course it is scandalous that this report was not made public.
However I am staggered by the response of Hackney councillors who have been advancing Option 1 in the recent Lonfon Fields consultation despite convincing evidence that it will displace traffic past schools on residential local roads which already have the worst problems.
The Council has apparently completely ignored the key issue of pollution in this process. Supported by the Green Party. Glass houses and stones?
Queensbridge & Gayhurst primary schools are amongst the schools listed here with excess pollution levels already. A recent independent report commissioned by local tenants associations has indicated that traffic levels are likely to increase significantly in front of these schools if Hackney Council introduce their proposed traffic filter scheme & cycle quietway down Middleton Road. A few people living on the most exclusive roads in Hackney will have traffic cut to their Roads at the expense of the health of local primary & nursery school children. How can this make sense? Asthma levels are known to increase significantly amongst children attending schools on roads with traffic in excess of 10,000 vehicles- Queensbridge and Richmond Road are already far exceeding these traffic figures. The council should be prioritising the health of local school children. No risk assessment regarding traffic displacement to schools was undertaken prior to designing this ill thought out filter scheme- how dare it’s proponents talk about ‘fume free streets’.
Ironic that councillor Feryal Demirci is criticising Boris here, given that she is pushing a traffic filter scheme in London Fields which will displace traffic & further pollution onto these already overloaded Roads with several schools. She gave no thought to this in the design of the scheme & Sian Berry & Hackney Greens also decided to support this scheme without taking on board concerns about the likely impact on local schools & children’s health. The wishes of out of borough cycle commuters are being prioritised over kids health. No impact or risk assessment was undertaken prior to LBH attempts to trial the scheme without informing local people in January 2016. Local people only found out about it through the efforts of local pensioner Mike Hood