Hackney councillor walks out of domestic violence debate after rejected amendment

Claudia Turbet-Delof (far left) protesting violence against women. Photograph: Claudia Turbet Delof
A council debate on how to tackle violence against females became fractious after an ex-Labour member walked out and rebuked colleagues for not supporting migrant women.
The meeting last week ended with councillors passing a motion that committed the Town Hall to giving school pupils access to classes on healthy relationships and “working towards preventing the erosion of vital services safeguarding the lives of vulnerable women and children”.
The Labour-run administration’s pledge followed the recent alleged killing of a local woman, Annabel Rook, who was found fatally stabbed after a gas explosion at her home. Her male partner was later charged with her murder.
However, there was acrimony earlier in the meeting when Hackney’s Green and Independent Socialist members put down an amendment to the motion, which they said did not “change its core [meaning]”.
The amendment included a more strongly-worded commitment to campaign against cuts to safeguarding services and mentioned barriers faced by migrant women and children accessing support.
Independent Socialist Cllr Claudia Turbet-Delof, who quit what she called the “toxic, abusive” Labour party last year, said she was proud to second the amendment “as a survivor of violence against women and girls”.
She urged the council to fight to protect very woman “regardless of background or paperwork”.
But after the Labour group overwhelmingly voted against the amended motion, meaning it would not be discussed, Cllr Turbet-Delof rebuked her former colleagues for “not caring about undocumented migrant women”.
She left the chamber with a parting shot: “This council stinks.”
The Speaker then instructed someone to go out and comfort her.
Cllr Sheila Suso-Runge (Labour) said she was “so sorry to see a sister in distress” before she praised the borough’s activism and work done in partnership with organisations like Latin American Women’s Aid, along with the council’s translated intervention services.
Holding back tears, she said: “I hope that she can hear me when I say to her that this is my story too.
“When violence crept out of the shadows and came for me, I would have been really grateful for the activism and all the things the council does.”
In a statement, Cllr Turbet-Delof said: “All councillors voted against a simple but vital amendment to explicitly include the needs of women most at risk, most invisible, and most failed by the current system.”
She added: “The reason why appears to be no more than party loyalty, simply because it came from an opposition councillor.”
Hackney Labour was asked why members voted down the proposed amendment but the party declined to comment.
Earlier in the meeting, councillors heard from Labour representative Midnight Ross.
“One woman is killed by a man every three days,” she said. “Behind closed doors in every ward and every street, there are women and girls living in fear.
“Whether in romantic or familial relationships, separated from their abusers on a night out or simply going for a walk, the threat of murder remains real.
“But that which doesn’t end in murder, still destroys worlds. Psychological abuse and coercive control can be just as devastating as physical harm.”
Cllr Ross added that women and girls were three times more likely to attempt suicide.
She said deeper and more “culturally sensitive” interventions were needed in the face of a “surge in toxic masculinity and misogynoir”, referring to hatred towards Black women.
“We will not stop until every woman and every girl is safe.”
In January, Labour, the Greens and Independent Socialists unanimously backed a motion to lobby the Home Secretary to reverse the Conservatives’ hostile environment policy towards undocumented migrants.

There are times when the cracks in a building reveal the cracks in a system — and this moment is one of them.
What happened in this chamber wasn’t just political — it was archetypal. A structure that once claimed moral authority is now buckling under the weight of its own contradictions. When truth is voted down in favour of performance, the spell breaks.
Hackney Town Hall was “born” in July 1937, under the sign of Cancer — the archetype of care, protection, and community. But right now, it is being tested by forces it cannot contain. What we’re witnessing — walkouts, emotional dissonance, erasure of the vulnerable — isn’t chaos, it’s karmic alignment.
To those who still feel, who still fight, and who refuse to dilute truth to preserve hierarchy — this moment is yours. Systems that cannot evolve are meant to collapse.
Hackney deserves better than a sanctuary that silences. And those who carry real stories — not slogans — are the ones holding the true authority now.
Soon the new party lead by Jeremy Corbyn and Zara Sultana will be up and running in Hackney ready to kick this so called Labour Council out into the dustbin of history in May 2026. They have been taking us for granted for too long.
Hackney council already has a commitment to migrant women and women with nrpf affected by violence and abuse. The amendment wasn’t necessary and the ‘walkout’councillor knows this. It was difficiult to pick up but it was confirmed by another councillor who talked at the end, like I did, the ‘walkout’ councillor could have taken the time to look the information up on council documents which say the same thing. Storming out a room because the sentence you want included is refused isn’t good politics and is kind of childish, can’t believe journalists watched the meeting and decided this was the only thing to talk about.
Annabel Rook was not “allegedly killed.”
She was murdered. A point you’re obviously aware of, given the fact that you’ve reported on the charge and arrest of someone in relation to her murder.
Please amend your article, as this us both crass and disrespectful.