Rough sleepers penalised via council loophole, group claims
Hackney Town Hall
People in Hackney are at risk of being criminalised for behaviour related to homelessness, mental health problems or eccentricity, campaigners against red tape say after discovering the Town Hall has been handing out warning notices for vaguely-defined acts like “loitering”.
Manifesto Club, which campaigns against what it regards as the “hyper-regulation” of everyday life, found via a Freedom of Information Act request that the council had slapped 20 people with Community Protection Notices (CPNs) in just one year for supposed transgressions such as “sleeping in bin stores” and “erecting an encampment”.
These official warnings can spark a bureaucratic process and may lead to the recipient being fined or winding up with a criminal record – although the council insists no case has yet gone that far.
Rough sleeping looked set to be banned in Hackney under controversial Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act and Public Space Protection Order, or PSPO, legislation. Following an outcry, Hackney Council ditched PSPOs.
Councillor Caroline Selman, who is in charge of community safety, said the council “will not take enforcement action in relation to rough sleeping itself”.
But she said that “where there are instances of persistent anti-social behaviour for someone who also has housing needs, we may need to consider enforcement action in relation to that anti-social behaviour”.
She added: “However, any such action will be taken as a last resort, and, importantly, within a broader context of support and outreach.”
Targeted
But Manifesto Club, which also campaigns against “over-cautious” child protection protocol as well as “all forms” of censorship nationwide, views CPNs as an authoritarian, counterproductive blunt instrument. The organisation cited one case where, it claims, a rough sleeper was targeted with a CPN in Hackney for “screaming and shouting persistently” – behaviour that some might suggest indicates mental health issues.
Josie Appleton, who authored a report on CPNs for Manifesto Club, said: “CPNs come with almost no restrictions on their use.”
She added: “A local authority officer can fill in a form ordering you to do or not do something, and it is a crime to disobey.
“The officer only needs to believe your conduct is having a ‘detrimental effect’ on the area, which is an incredibly low burden of proof. The potential for the abuse of this power is massive.”
The council distributed 20 CPNs between October 2014 and October 2015.
In the same time frame, neighbouring Islington Council issued just one – relating to an escaped dog.
Appleton’s report points out that CPNs are unequal in their application. They prohibit specific activities only for certain people, rather than for everyone.
Persons issued with CPNs can be fined and can even prosecuted and then left with a criminal record if they breach the terms of their CPN.
Complaint
Hackney Council’s press office said the council had to date “not found it necessary” to prosecute anyone for breaching a CPN.
They also said CPNs had in some cases been issued as a means of securing vulnerable people’s engagement with outreach services in order to help them get their lives back on track.
The council gave the Hackney Citizen detailed information suggesting this was the case with the CPNs issued for in the “bin store” and encampment cases – though has not been possible to independently verify this.
Another CPN was issued to someone who persistently loitered in a petrol station forecourt and begged for money aggressively, the council said.
A press officer added: “A CPN is usually served in response to a complaint. Having some evidence of those complaints, after serving a written warning if there is then further evidence that the antisocial behaviour is continuing, then a CPN will be issued…
“On occasions it has been the support agencies who have asked the council or police to serve a CPN as a route to engagement.”
But Appleton warned CPNs were being used to “restrict homeless people in the borough.”
Hackney has the highest rate of mental health hospital admissions in London, and anecdotal evidence suggests rough sleeping is on the rise. Mayor of Hackney Philip Glanville recently appointed Councillor Rebecca Rennison to advise him on how to prevent homelessness.
These PSPO’s are inexcusable and allow the homeless and those with problems to be criminalised at random on the say so of an official with a badge and yellow vest who have been given power over people they have no right to have. This is the new authoritarianism. There is more on this and the protest which took place in Hackney over this here-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hI4oGE9JxSk-a must watch and share-the council need to know there are plenty of us in Hackney who think they should ditch this scheme. They should also provide a year round crisis shelter for people made homeless. When I found a young women sleeping rough in our garden I was told by the council they could not provide and to call the police! It’s a disgrace.
I live beside and use St John’s Churchyard in Hackney every day. I see the impact that the rough sleeping and associated anti-social behaviour are having on our everyday life. I suspect the members of the Manifesto Club live no where near and have no experience of dealing with this very complex issue. I fully support the Council in the use of this new power to try and tackle this problem. It is not the rough sleeping per se but the associated issues with long term and persistent homelessness. What we are seeing at the moment is an escalation of that, with discarded needles, human defecation, open intravenous drug injecting in broad daylight and now the associated dealing and weapons. When you take your young children past this every day and you know there are individuals that are refusing to engage with support and help then what other option does the Council have.