Houseboaters being ‘forced out’ of Olympics area

houseboaters river lea

British Waterways (BW) has been accused of “forcing out” Hackney’s boaters after it announced plans to limit mooring times and impose fines for overstaying in an area close to the Olympic site.

The organisation, which looks after waterways including the Regent’s Canal and River Lea, wants those who live on narrowboats to buy visitor passes, some costing in excess of hundreds of pounds per week, to moor in a specially designated zone close to the site.

British Waterways said the measures were necessary to cover the costs of increased security in the area and to ensure all boaters had a chance to book spots close to where the London 2012 Games will take place.

But Hackney boater Frank Kelly, who has to regularly attend Homerton Hospital due to health problems, said the requirement was unreasonable.

He said: “Our boats are our homes. It’s an entirely reasonable thing to expect to live in our homes, to be able to access our jobs, GPs and healthcare, and interact with our chosen community, and not be separated from that.”

While boaters with permanent moorings will be unaffected, continuous cruiser craft such as Mr Kelly’s, which are required by law to make a journey around BW’s network once every two weeks, will have a particularly tough time avoiding the so-called Controlled Mooring Zone (CMZ).


View British Waterways Olympic 2012 Exclusion Zone in a larger map

Mr Kelly, who has started a social media protest campaign backed by dozens of other boaters, said he had no problem with restrictions being put in place around the Olympic Stadium but felt British Waterways was trying to profit from paid moorings – a claim the organisation rejects.

He said: “We’re happy to move within a reasonable area, and our movements take us out of the area briefly, but that’s different from being forced out for two or three months.”

A British Waterways spokesperson said: “We’re not looking to profit in any way. It is likely we will just be covering the costs of the extra security we’ll be required to provide for the slots. We want everyone in the country to have the same fair chance to book one of these spots when they’re coming to enjoy the Olympics.

“Boaters within the zones as well have the opportunity to book these spots — if they decide to do that, they will be staying within the zone. Otherwise, we’re working very hard with the local groups to make convenient mooring spots available outside the zone.”

British Waterways’ plans mean boaters will require a visitor pass on what is essentially the entirety of Regent’s Canal, along with Lea River south of Lea Bridge.

Some fear this will push boaters without a permanent mooring west of Little Venice near Paddington and north of Lea Bridge Road in Hackney.

British Waterways said the Controlled Mooring Zone had been created in conjunction with the police, requiring the organisation to have records of all craft travelling within the zone during the Olympics.

The spokesperson added: “The police have asked us also to set up a wider control zone across the waterways in London — they want us to have a record of everyone who comes into and out of that zone, and who is within the zone. There will be checkpoints so the police will have the security of knowing who’s on the waterways at the time.”

The police said discussions about the Controlled Mooring Zone were ongoing.

6 Comments

  1. oddie on Monday 2 January 2012 at 10:02

    boats can double moor where space permits, a continuous journey is not required, roving mooring permits (similar to river only licences) resolve anxiety and olympic security is not the financial concern of brutish waterways



  2. Tamsin on Monday 2 January 2012 at 11:49

    How utterly stupid. will the police be stopping cars below Tottenham and east of Paddington. No. this is discrimination at the very least. Surely it would be quite simple to post security at random locks to spot check boats as they do at Canary Wharf. This is completely unreasonable and smacks of a dreadfulf money making scheme that will persecute people already trying to live life on a budget…..arrrrrrg Very Annoyed of Bow.



  3. Allan Cazaly on Tuesday 3 January 2012 at 13:38

    My personal view is that IF ALL EXISTING boaters stayed where they are on moorings and NOT BE FORCED to move, the security aspect would be much simpler for the Police. They would have a record of each boat and “livaboard” and this is the simplest and easiest way of “controlling” the important security aspect of the games!
    British Waterways should concern themselves to looking after the condition, repair and maintenance of the canals and not get involved with Security, which is a Police matter.
    Where/What are the EXTRA costs for BW – I think this is total nonsense (Burocracy at it’s Best)



  4. paul on Sunday 8 January 2012 at 22:26

    yep. brutish waterways are mandated to manage the canal network – not socially displace boaters, deny access to community, work, or the safety net of social benefits /|\



  5. JO on Wednesday 1 February 2012 at 13:26

    OUTRAGEOUS

    if British Waterways need money to fund policing THEN THIS SHOULD COME FROM THE OLYMPIC FUNDS not be passed on to boat owners.



  6. Rod Taylor on Monday 27 February 2012 at 17:36

    It is not only BW trying to profit from excessive mooring fees. BWML moorers at Poplar Dock and Limehouse are being held to ransom with rises in our residential mooring fees of up to 230%.
    If we do not win our fight against this ABUSE of a dominant position in the London mooring market there could be at least a dozen narrowboats joining the boating communities on the canal tow paths who will be priced out.
    For the full report please email mvwylam@hotmail.com

    Table 1
    Length in Metres Eq in Ft Current £ 2011/12 As of Apr 1st 2012 % Increase Total increase in Year 3 Total Increase in Year 3 (Wide)
    9.50 31.17 £3,543.50 £5,043.50 42.33% 153.99% 230.18%
    10.00 32.81 £3,730.00 £5,230.00 40.21% 141.29% 213.67%
    10.50 34.45 £3,916.50 £5,416.50 38.30% 129.80% 198.74%
    11.00 36.09 £4,103.00 £5,603.00 36.56% 119.35% 185.16%
    11.50 37.73 £4,289.50 £5,789.50 34.97% 109.81% 172.76%
    12.00 39.37 £4,476.00 £5,976.00 33.51% 101.07% 161.39%
    12.50 41.01 £4,662.50 £6,162.50 32.17% 93.03% 150.94%
    13.00 42.65 £4,849.00 £6,349.00 30.93% 85.61% 141.29%
    13.50 44.29 £5,035.50 £6,535.50 29.79% 78.73% 132.35%
    14.00 45.93 £5,222.00 £6,722.00 28.72% 72.35% 124.05%
    14.50 47.57 £5,408.50 £6,908.50 27.73% 66.40% 116.33%
    15.00 49.21 £5,595.00 £7,095.00 26.81% 60.86% 109.12%
    15.50 50.85 £5,781.50 £7,281.50 25.94% 55.67% 102.37%
    16.00 52.49 £5,968.00 £7,468.00 25.13% 50.80% 96.05%
    16.50 54.13 £6,154.50 £7,654.50 24.37% 46.23% 90.10%
    17.00 55.77 £6,341.00 £7,841.00 23.66% 41.93% 84.51%
    17.50 57.41 £6,527.50 £8,027.50 22.98% 37.88% 79.24%
    18.00 59.06 £6,714.00 £8,214.00 22.34% 34.05% 74.26%
    18.50 60.70 £6,900.50 £8,400.50 21.74% 30.43% 69.55%
    19.00 62.34 £7,087.00 £8,587.00 21.17% 26.99% 65.09%
    19.50 63.98 £7,273.50 £8,773.50 20.62% 23.74% 60.86%
    20.00 65.62 £7,460.00 £8,960.00 20.11% 20.64% 56.84%
    20.50 67.26 £7,646.50 £9,000.00 17.70% 17.70% 53.01%
    21.00 68.90 £7,833.00 £9,000.00 14.90% 14.90% 49.37%
    21.50 70.54 £8,019.50 £9,000.00 12.23% 12.23% 45.89%
    22.00 72.18 £8,206.00 £9,000.00 9.68% 9.68% 42.58%



Leave a Comment





This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.