Councillors’ fury at Hackney Today decision

Hackney Today Hackney Citizen Town Hall

"Whoah!... Looks like council funded newspapers are hanging on in there after central government threatened to pull them out of circulation," says Hackney artist Stik. Photograph: Claude Crommelin

A decision by Hackney Council to continue publishing Hackney Today, its free fortnightly paper, in defiance of new government guidelines has sparked an angry response from minority party councillors. They claim the publication is a waste of public money and a political mouthpiece for the ruling Labour group.

“Hackney Today is a wretched propaganda sheet and costs Hackney residents thousands,” says Hackney Liberal Democrat Simon de Deney. “Switching statutory notices and other advertisements to independent media would save money and create a more diverse media and culture in Hackney.”

Conservative councillor Michael Levy, leader of Hackney Conservatives, claims Hackney Today neglects the work of opposition councillors.

“We’ve always felt that it [Hackney Today] is an organ of the majority [Labour] group on the Council,” he says. “Things which are carried out by minority group members and which benefit the community as a whole are not reported in the same depth or not at all.”

The Labour controlled council voted to keep the fortnightly newspaper this evening despite guidelines agreed by parliament in March which say councils must not produce such publications more than four times a year.

The council is one of the very few local authorities in the country to do so. The government’s Communities Secretary Eric Pickles recently single out Hackney, Tower Hamlets and Greenwich for flouting his guidelines, which were passed by Parliament in March.

The council’s own report on local authority publicity, which was considered by Cabinet this evening, maintains that the government guidelines are not legally enforceable, and that the council will abide by the principles of the government’s new Code of Recommended Practice.

Amongst other recommendations, the Code states: “Local authorities should not publish or incur expenditure in commissioning in hard copy or on any website, newsletters, newssheets or similar communications which seek to emulate commercial newspapers in style or content.”

Hackney Today, which is delivered to over 90,000 homes, cost £532,068 to produce in the twelve months from April 2009 and March 2010, equivalent to £21,282 per issue. Less than a third of this cost was covered by revenue from non-council advertising.

Cllr Louisa Thomson, spokesperson for the Labour group on the council defends the paper.

“Hackney Today fulfils a vital role in letting residents know about local services – from the council, health services, the police and others – particularly as not everyone living in the borough has regular access to the internet,” she says. “This also contributes to greater transparency and accountability in local government.”

Note: this article was revised at 13:00 on Friday 30 June 2011.

6 Comments

  1. NoopyDoopy on Monday 20 June 2011 at 22:55

    Disastrous decision.



  2. Matt Woods on Monday 20 June 2011 at 23:22

    Glad to see Hackney Labour are protecting such vital services as this Pravda. Hopefully they’ve ring-fenced the “sending headteachers to Arizona” budget and the “£250,000 rock for Mabley Green” budget too.



  3. thruppence on Tuesday 21 June 2011 at 07:35

    the rocks (there’s one in shoreditch park too) were paid for by an outside body.



  4. Rob Ray on Saturday 25 June 2011 at 20:13

    Hackney Today is a waste of space. Having said so, Archant’s Hackney Gazette is barely any better – which is only to be expected when it cuts its staff so severely that they just end up re-nosing the same set of PR and police releases as Today runs.

    Props to the Citizen for actually putting out a product which has something interesting to say.



  5. Leabridge resident on Friday 8 July 2011 at 13:53

    In Hackney, Labour Rules. They are the majority, the opposition, the pseudo-independent local groups, e.g. Clapton Conference. Any other political view is simply ignored, banned or gagged. Our opinion is of no interest to our great Leader-s.



  6. The Great Smell Of Brute on Monday 11 July 2011 at 12:08

    @Leabridge Resident: you’re forgetting that even dissenting voices within the Labour group tend to get silenced, due to behind-closed-doors ‘debates’ and comprehensive (ab)use of the party whip. Local democracy, anyone?



Leave a Comment





This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.